SemesterFall Semester, 2025
DepartmentJunior Class of Department of Public Administration Senior Class of Department of Public Administration
Course NameComparative Public Policy in Greater China
InstructorWONG WAI MAN NATALIE
Credit3.0
Course TypeElective
Prerequisite
Course Objective
Course Description
Course Schedule


























































































Week



Topic



Focus 



1



Course Introduction



Course scope, objectives, and the rationale for comparing public policy in Greater China



2



Theory Building



Theories of comparative policy analysis: How well do they apply to Greater China?



3



 



No Class (Topic selection and preparation) 


        4  Political & Economic Dynamics Comparing the political economy and institutional foundations of policy in HK, China, and Macau

5



Domestic Context of Policy Making



How domestic administrative structures shape policy implementation differently



6



Globalization & Public Policy



Varying impacts of globalization on policy agenda-setting across the region



7



Policy Transfer & Lesson Drawing



How, when, and why policies travel across borders in Greater China



8



Social Security Policy (Part I)



Institutional models and policy goals: A cross-region comparison



9



Social Security Policy (Part II)



Examining reforms, equity challenges, and outcomes



10



Healthcare Policy (Part I)



Governance and financing models across health systems



11



Healthcare Policy (Part II)



(**Reflection note due)



Service delivery, public-private roles, and citizen access



12



Environmental Policy (Part I)



Regulation and enforcement structures across jurisdictions



13



Environmental Policy (Part II)



Public engagement, protest, and environmental justice



14



Group Presentations I



Case presentations



15



Group Presentations II



Case presentations



16



Paper Consultation



One-on-one guidance on final paper development



Teaching Methods
Teaching Assistant
Requirement/Grading

  1. Class Participation (10%): Students are expected to read the assigned reading materials and actively engage in class discussions. 

  2. In-class discussions (20%): The arrangement will be announced in the first lecture. 

  3. Group Presentation (35%): Students are expected to form a group and give a presentation (around 20 to 30 mins) in Weeks 14 and 15 respectively. The topics of presentation should be related to the context of this course, and the arrangement will be announced in the first lecture. After the presentation, a group project (15%) (around 5,000 words) should be submitted by 24 Dec 2025

  4. Individual-based reading reflection note (20%): Students must write a paper with 1,500-2,500 words. Evaluating arguments of one (at least) selected article from a prescribed reading list, then developing the arguments in the reflection note.. The reflection note demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the academic literature on a specific topic placed in context. The note should be submitted by WEEK 11. Please ensure your full name and student number are written down on the note. 



 


Textbook & Reference

Comparative Public Policy – Concepts, Theories, Approaches



 



Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (2010). Part V Public Policy, The Policy Process. In R. Hague, & M. Harrop (Eds.), Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction (pp. 365-385). Palgrave.



 



Ryan, M. (2018). Comparative Method. In V. Lowndes, D. Marsh, & G. Stoker, Gerry (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science (pp. 271-289). Macmillan.



 



Peters, B. G. (2018). Comparative Politics and Comparative Policy Studies: Making the Linkage. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(1), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1414409



 



Geva-May, I., Hoffman, D. C., & Muhleisen, J. (2018). Twenty years of comparative policy analysis: A survey of the field and a discussion of topics and methods. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1405618



 



Radin, B. A., & Weimer, D. L. (2018). Compared to what? the multiple meanings of comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 20(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1414475



 



Concept of Greater China region



 



Wong, N.W.M. (2021).  Chapter 1 Introduction. In N.W.M. Wong (Ed.), The Politics of Waste Management in Greater China Environmental Governance and Public Participation in Transition (pp. 1-14). Routledge.



 



Harding, H. (1993). The Concept of ‘Greater China’: Themes, Variations, and Reservations. The China Quarterly, 136, 660-686. https://doi.org/10.2307/655587



 



Shambaugh, D. (1993). Introduction: The Emergence of ‘Greater China.’ The China



Quarterly, 136, 653-659. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/s0305741000032288



 



Su, T.-T., Walker, R. M., & Xue, L. (2013). Reform and Transition in Public Administration Theory and Practice in Greater China. Public Administration, 91(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12030



 



Political and Economic Dynamics of Policy Making



 



Cameron, D. R. (1978). The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review, 72(04), 1243–1261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954537



 



Blais, A., Kim, J., & Foucault, M. (2010). Public spending, public deficits, and government coalitions. Political Studies, 58(5), 829-846. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00842.x



 



Domestic Context of Policy Making



 



Weaver, R.K., &. Rockman, B.A (1993). Assessing the effects of institutions. In R.K. Weaver, & B.A. Rockman (Eds), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad (pp. 1-41). The Brookings Institution.



 



Globalization and Public Policy



 



Garrett, G. (2001). Globalization and government spending around the world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(4), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02732706



 



Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2002). The policy effects of internationalization: A subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980208412669



 



Aspaltier, C. (2006). The East Asian Welfare Model. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15, 290-301. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00413.x



 



Policy Transfer & Learning, Looking for Lessons and Venturing Abroad



 



Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learning What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x



 



James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing” for Public Policy Research. Political Studies Review, Vol 1(2), 179-193. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1478-9299.t01-1-00003



 



Bomberg, E. (2007). Policy learning in an enlarged European Union: environmental NGOs and new policy instruments. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760601122522



 



Fiorino, D. J. (2001). Environmental Policy As Learning: A New View of an Old Landscape. Public Administration Review, 61(3), 322- 334. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0033-3352.00033



 



Shefer, I. (2018). Policy transfer in city-to-city cooperation: implications for urban climate governance learning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1562668. 



 



Wong, N.W.M. (2021).  Chapter 6 Policy transfer in municipal waste management, The ‘Taipei model’ and its impacts on the Greater China region. In N.W.M. Wong (Ed.), The Politics of Waste Management in Greater China Environmental Governance and Public Participation in Transition (pp. 93-109). Routledge. 



 



Social Security Policy



 



Peng, C., & Wang, J. (2023). Local Integration of Urban–Rural Social-assistance Programmes in China: What Are the Driving Forces? The China Quarterly, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023001030



 



Liu, Y., Liu, J., & Zhou, Y. (2017). Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.002 



 



Yu, A. (2020). The failure of the welfare ideology and system in Hong Kong: A historical perspective. Human Affairs, 31(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2021-0009



 



Fung, K. (2017). Neoliberalization and community development practices in Hong Kong. Community Development Journal, 52(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw048



 



Mok, K. H., Kühner, S., & Huang, G. (2017). The Productivist Construction of Selective Welfare Pragmatism in China. Social Policy & Administration, 51(6), 876–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12337



 



Lee, E. W. Y. (2008). Social mobilization, blame avoidance and welfare restructuring in Hong Kong. In M. Sing (Ed.) Politics and Government in Hong Kong: Crisis under Chinese Sovereignty (pp. 162-175). Routledge.



 



Chan, K. W. (2012). Rethinking flexible welfare strategy in Hong Kong: a new direction for the East Asian welfare model? Journal of Asian Public Policy, 5(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/17516234.2012.662358



 



Lai, D. W. L., & Chui, E. W. T. (2014). A Tale of Two Cities: A Comparative Study on the Welfare Regimes of Hong Kong and Macao. Social Policy and Society, 13(02), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000614



 



Yu, S. W.K., Chau, R. C.M., Boxall, K., & Chung, W.C.Y. (2014). Looking to the East and the West: The double-attachment strategy used by the Hong Kong government to develop welfare to work measures for lone parents. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30(2): 93-106. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/21699763.2013.861357



 



Yeung, D. Y. (2013). Is pre-retirement planning always good? An exploratory study of retirement adjustment among Hong Kong Chinese retirees. Aging & Mental Health, 17(3), 386-393. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13607863.2012.732036



 



Lai, D. W. L. (2017). A comparative study of social assistance systems in Macao and Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 27(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02185385.2017.1310054



 



Li, S. (2011). Issues and Options for Social Security Reform in China.  China: An International Journal, 09(1), 72-109. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2011.0001



 



Healthcare Policy



 



He, J. (2019). Healthcare policy and reforms in Hong Kong. In W. Dong (Eds). Social Policy in China: From State-led to Market-led Economy (pp. 211-224). Rock’s Mills Press.



 



Daemmrich, A. (2013). The political economy of healthcare reform in China: negotiating public and private. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 448. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-448.



 



Chung, Y. R., Chan, D., Chau, N. N., Huang, S., Wong, H., Wong, S. Y. (2019). Poverty affects access to regular source of primary care among the general population in Hong Kong. Social Policy & Administration, 2019(53), 854-871. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12538 (SSCI)



 



He, A. J., Bali, A. S., & Ramesh, M. (2022). Active stewardship in healthcare: Lessons from China's health policy reforms. Social Policy & Administration, 56(6), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12832



 



Chindarkar, N., Nakajima, M., & Wu, A. (2022). Inequality of Opportunity in Health Among Urban, Rural, and Migrant Children: Evidence from China. Journal of Social Policy, 1-20. doi:10.1017/S0047279422000782



 



Environmental Policy



 



Wong, N. W. M. (2016). Environmental protests and NIMBY activism: Local politics and waste management in Beijing and Guangzhou. China Information, 30(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0920203X16641550.



 



Wong, N. W. M. (2018). Environmental policy change in two transitional societies: a comparative study on anti-incinerator construction in Guangzhou and Taipei. Asian Geographer, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2018.1547201



 



Wong, N.W.M. (2021).  Chapter 4 Guangzhou, Roles of public participation in MSW governance. In N.W.M. Wong (Ed.), The Politics of Waste Management in Greater China Environmental Governance and Public Participation in Transition (pp. 39-76). Routledge. 



 



Wong, N.W.M. (2021).  Chapter 5 Hong Kong, Unresponsive collective action in MSW politics. In N.W.M. Wong (Ed.), The Politics of Waste Management in Greater China Environmental Governance and Public Participation in Transition (pp. 77-92). Routledge. 



 



Song, Q., Li, J., Duan, H., Yu, D., & Wang, Z, (2017). Towards to sustainable energy-efficient city: A case study of Macau. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 504-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.018



 



Song, Q., Wang, Z., & Li, J. (2016). Exploring residents’ attitudes and willingness to pay for solid waste management in Macau. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 23(16), 16456–16462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6590-8.



 


Urls about Course
Attachment