Week週次 | Topic課程主題 | Content and Reading Assignment
課程內容與指定閱讀 | Teaching Activities and Homework教學活動與作業 | 1
02/18 | Introduction | *O'Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge University Press. | Interested topic | 2
02/25 | Who cares? Welfare, childcare, & social reproduction | *Orloff, A. (1996). Gender in the welfare state. Annual review of sociology, 22(1), 51-78.
*Orloff, A. S. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological theory, 27(3), 317-343.
*Han, W. J., Ruhm, C., & Waldfogel, J. (2009). Parental leave policies and parents' employment and leave‐taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 28(1), 29-54. | Interested topic | 3
03/04 | Family, community, market &state | Hakim, C. (2003). Competing family models, competing social policies. Family matters, (64), 52-61.
O'Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge | Importance and research gap | 4
03/11 | Family, work& childcare | Jenson, J. (2004). Changing the paradigm: Family responsibility or investing in children. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 169-192.
Wallace, C. (2020). Between state, market and family: Changing childcare policies in urban China and the implications for working mothers. International Sociology, 35(3), 336-352.
White, L. A., & Friendly, M. (2020). Public funding, private delivery: States, markets, and early childhood education and care in liberal welfare states–A comparison of Australia, the UK, Quebec, and New Zealand. In Policy Sectors in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies (pp. 185-203). Routledge. | Importance and research gap | 5
03/18 | Family & long-term care | Hooyman, N. R., & Gonyea, J. G. (1999). A feminist model of family care: Practice and policy directions. Journal of Women & aging, 11(2-3), 149-169.
Tennstedt, S. L., Crawford, S. L., & McKinlay, J. B. (1993). Is family care on the decline? A longitudinal investigation of the substitution of formal long-term care services for informal care. The Milbank Quarterly, 601-624.
Verbakel, E. (2018). How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(4), 436-447. | Literature review | 6
03/25 | Family, work, and income | *Ferragina, E. (2019). The political economy of family policy expansion: Fostering neoliberal capitalism or promoting gender equality supporting social reproduction? Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), 1238-1265.
*Heymann, J., Sprague, A. R., Nandi, A., Earle, A., Batra, P., Schickedanz, A., ... & Raub, A. (2017). Paid parental leave and family wellbeing in the sustainable development era. Public health reviews, 38, 1-16. | Literature review | 7
04/01 | Family and work balance | *Feld, L. D., Sarkar, M., Au, J. S., Flemming, J. A., Gripshover, J., Kardashian, A., ... & Villa, E. (2023). Parental leave, childcare policies, and workplace bias for hepatology professionals: A national survey. Hepatology Communications, 7(9), e0214.
*Gornick, J. C., & Heron, A. (2020). The regulation of working time as work-family reconciliation policy: Comparing Europe, Japan, and the United States. In Policy Sectors in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies (pp. 239-256). Routledge.
*Lee, C. J., Seo, I., & Lee, Y. (2023). Comparison of Women’s Labor Market Participation between Types of Childcare Policies Based on Policy Tool Mix. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1-20. | Literature map | 8
04/08 | Paper consult 01 | Individual or group | PPT draft | 9
04/15 | Field work | Data collection | Research method | 10
04/22 | Family and work balance | *Feeney, M. K., & Stritch, J. M. (2019). Family-friendly policies, gender, and work–life balance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 422-448.
*Kawaguchi, A. (2013). Equal Employment Opportunity Act and work-life balance: do work-family balance policies contribute to achieving gender equality? Japan Labor Review, 10(2), 35-56.
*Roberts, G. S. (2005). Balancing work and life: Whose work? Whose life? Whose balance? Asian Perspective, 175-211.
Chang, W. B. (2023). 家庭照顧與職場勞動的平衡: 我國長期照顧假之法制建構. 社科法政論叢, (11), 91-130. | Policy evaluation | 11
04/29 | Marriage Immigration, Work, and Care | *Eggebø, H. (2013). A real marriage? Applying for marriage migration to Norway. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 39(5), 773-789.
*Kim, M. (2010). Gender and international marriage migration. Sociology compass, 4(9), 718-731.
*Piper, N., & Lee, S. (2016). Marriage migration, migrant precarity, and social reproduction in Asia: an overview. Critical Asian Studies, 48(4), 473-493.
王宏仁 (2001) 社會階層化下的婚姻與國內勞動市場:以越南新娘為例。 台灣 社會研究季刊,41,101-127。
鄭詩穎、余漢儀(2014)。順從有時,抵抗有時:東南亞新移民女性家庭照顧經 驗中的拉鋸與選擇。臺大社工學刊,29,149-198。 | Policy comparison | 12
05/06 | Marriage Immigration, Work, and Care | *Choi, S. (2023). The Marriage of Care Labor and Self-Care: Marriage Migration and Neoliberal Refashioning of Care in South Korea. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 48(4), 991-1013.
*Lan, P. C. (2008). New global politics of reproductive labor: Gendered labor and marriage migration. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1801-1815.
*Hsia, H. C. (2009). Foreign brides, multiple citizenship and the immigrant movement in Taiwan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 18(1), 17-46.
Kim, A. E. (2014). Global migration and South Korea: Foreign workers, foreign brides and the making of a multicultural society. In Migration: policies, practices, activism (pp. 69-91). Routledge. | Policy comparison | 13
05/13 | Transnational migration and care I | *Lutz, H. (2018). Care migration: The connectivity between care chains, care circulation and transnational social inequality. Current Sociology, 66(4), 577-589.
*Pyle, J. L. (2006). Globalization, transnational migration, and gendered care work: Introduction. Globalizations, 3(3), 283-295.
*Williams, F. (2010). Migration and care: Themes, concepts and challenges. Social Policy and Society, 9(3), 385-396. | Discussion | 14
05/20 | Transnational migration and care II | *Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2013). Locating transnational care circulation in migration and family studies. In Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care (pp. 25-58). Routledge.
*Bryceson, D. F. (2019). Transnational families negotiating migration and care life cycles across nation-state borders. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(16), 3042-3064.
*Hoang, L. A., Lam, T., Yeoh, B. S., & Graham, E. (2015). Transnational migration, changing care arrangements and left-behind children's responses in South-east Asia. Children's geographies, 13(3), 263-277. | Discussion | 15
05/27 | Paper consult 02 | Individual or group | Discussion | 16
06/03 | Final PPT | Presentation 15-20 minutes | Upload PPT | 17
06/10 | Final PPT | Presentation 15-20 minutes | Upload PPT | 18
06/17 | Final report comments and revision | Teachers and classmates comment to revise the final report (Turnitin) | Final report submission |
|