Criteria
|
Excellent (90-100)
|
Proficient (80-89)
|
Satisfactory (70-79)
|
Needs Improvement (60-69)
|
Unsatisfactory (Below 60)
|
Learning Objectives (Clarity & Alignment)
(10%)
|
Clearly defined, measurable, and well-aligned with the course/module goals. The objectives provide a strong foundation for assessment and instruction.
|
Mostly clear and measurable; aligned with the course/module goals but may need minor refinements.
|
Somewhat clear but may lack specificity or strong alignment with the course/module goals.
|
Objectives are vague, difficult to measure, or not well connected to the learning goals.
|
Objectives are missing, unclear, or not relevant to the course/module content.
|
Learning Activity Design (Completeness & Effectiveness)
(30%)
|
Activities are well-structured, covering all key stages: Acquisition, Investigation, Discussion, Collaboration, Practice, and Production. Activities effectively support learning goals.
|
Activities are mostly well-structured and address most key learning stages, with slight gaps in design or effectiveness.
|
Activities cover some key stages but may be underdeveloped or lack engagement.
|
Activities are poorly structured, missing key stages, and may not effectively facilitate learning.
|
Activities are incomplete, missing critical components, or do not align with learning goals.
|
Innovation & Teaching Strategies
(20%)
|
Incorporates creative and diverse teaching methods (e.g., gamification, case studies, role-playing) to actively engage students.
|
Demonstrates some level of creativity and includes multiple teaching strategies, though execution may need refinement.
|
Uses conventional teaching methods with limited innovation, but still supports learning.
|
Relies heavily on traditional teaching approaches, limiting student engagement.
|
Lacks innovative teaching strategies; little to no effort to engage students in active learning.
|
Lesson Plan Coherence (Logical Flow & Organization)
(20%)
|
The lesson plan is logically structured, easy to follow, and clearly presents each component. Transitions between activities are smooth.
|
The lesson plan is mostly well-structured, but some areas may need refinement for better coherence.
|
The lesson plan follows a basic structure but may be disorganized in some parts.
|
The lesson plan lacks logical progression, making it difficult to follow.
|
The lesson plan is highly disorganized, with missing or unclear sections.
|
Feasibility (Practicality & Implementation Readiness)
(20%)
|
The lesson plan is highly feasible for real classroom implementation, with clear details on time allocation, materials, and student engagement.
|
The lesson plan is mostly practical but may need minor adjustments for effective classroom implementation.
|
The lesson plan is somewhat feasible but lacks details on execution.
|
The lesson plan has significant feasibility issues, making classroom implementation difficult.
|
The lesson plan is impractical or incomplete, making it unrealistic for classroom use.
|