SemesterFall Semester, 2020
DepartmentPhD Program of Business Administration, First Year PhD Program of Business Administration, Second Year
Course NameResearch Methodology for Marketing
InstructorLOU YUNG-CHIEN
Credit3.0
Course TypeElective
Prerequisite
Course Objective
Course Description
Course Schedule

Reading List



 



1. Asking Questions



 



Sudman, Seymour, “The Social Context of Question Asking,” in Asking Questions,



Chapter 1, 1982, p1-19.



 



Sudman, Seymour, “Asking Nonthreating Questions About Behavior,” in Asking



Questions, Chapter 2, 1982, p20-53.



 



Sudman, Seymour, “Asking Threating Questions About Behavior,” in Asking



Questions, Chapter 3, 1982, p54-87.



 



Sudman, Seymour, “Questions for Measuring Knowledge,” in Asking



Questions, Chapter 4, 1982, p88-118.



 



Sudman, Seymour, “Measuring Attidudes,” in Asking



Questions, Chapter 5-6, 1982, p119-147.



 



Bradburn, Norman M. and Seymour Sudman, “Effects of Question Threat and



Interview Method,” in Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design, Chapter 1, 1979, p1-13



 



Bradburn, Norman M. and Seymour Sudman, “Impact of Question Structure and



Length,” in Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design, Chapter 1, 1979, p14-25



 



 



2. Sampling



 



Sudman, Seymour and Blair, Edward, “Sampling in the Twenty-First Century,”



Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, v27n2, Spring, p269-277.



 



Sudman, Seymour, “Improving the Quality of Shopping Center Sampling,” Journal of



Marketing Research, 1980, v17n4, Nov p. 423-431.



 



 



3. Survey



 



Feldman, Jack M. and John G. Lynch (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other



Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology,73 (3), 421-433.



 



Tourangeau, Roger and Kenneth A. Rasinski (1988), “Cognitive Process Underlying



Context Effects in Attitude Measurement,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 299-314.



 



Roger Tourangeau, A Rasinski, Norman Bradburn, Roy D’Andrade, “Carryover Effects in Attitude Surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1989, vol.53, I4, Winter, p.495-524.



 



Seymour Sudman and Norbert Schwarz, “Contributions of Cognitive Psychology to



Advertising Research,” Journal of Advertising Research, 1989, June/July, p.43-53.



 



Bickart, Barbara A., Johnny Blair, Geeta Menon, and Seymour Sudman, “Cognitive



Aspects of Proxy Reporting of Behavior,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, 1990, 198-206.



 



田芳華(民88),「認知訪談在調查研究上的應用──以假設市場評價法為例」,國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,七月,九卷,三期,頁555-574



 



4. Order Effects



 



樓永堅(民88),「問題次序的訪答效應之初探」,調查研究,第七期,頁33-58。



 



Norbert Schwarz, Herbert Bless, “Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Attitude Measurement: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model,” Advances in Consumer Research 1992, v19, p72-77.



 



Roger Tourangeau, Kenneth A. Rasinski, and Norman Bradburn, “Measuring Happiness in Surveys: A test of The Subtraction Hypothesis,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1991, v55, p.255-266.



 



Frank R. Kardes, Paul M. Herr, “Order Effects in Consumer Judgment, Choice, and Memory: The Role of Initial Processing Goals,” Advances in Consumer Research, 1990, vol.17, p.541-546.



 



Schuman, Howard and Stanley Presser, “Question Order and Response Order,” in Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Questions Form, Wording, and Content, New York: Academic Press, p.23-77.



 



Robert Mason, John E. Carlson, Roger Tourangeau, “Contrast Effects and Subtraction in Part-Whole Questions,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1994, vol.58, p.569-578.



 



Norbert Schwarz, Hans-J. Hippler, “Subsequent Questions May Influence Answers to Preceding Questions in Mail surveys,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1995, vol.59, p.93-97.



 



J. Edwin Benton, John L. Daly, “A Question Order Effect in a Local Government Survey,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1991, vol.55, I4, Winter, p.640-642.



 



Howard Schuman, Stanley Presser, Jacob Ludwig, “Context Effects on Survey Responses to Questions about Abortion,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, vol.45, I2, Summer, p.216-223.



 



George F. Bishop, Robert W. Oldendick, Alfred J. Tuchfarber, “The Importance of Replicating a Failure to Replicate: Order Effects on Abortion Items,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1985, vol.49, I1, Spring, p.105-114.



 



Philip Gendall, Victoria Carmichael and Janet Hoek, “A Test of The Conversational Logic Analysis Model of Question Order Effects,” Marketing Bulletin, 1997, vol.8, p.41-52.



 



Norbert Schwarz, Hans-J. Hippler, and Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, “A Cognitive Model of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement,” Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, 1992, p.187-201.



 



Abigail T. Panter, Jeffrey S. Tanaka, and Tracy R. Wellens, “The Psychometrics of Order Effects,” Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, 1992, p.249-266.



 



 



5. Context Effects



 



Geeta Menon, Barbara Bickart, “Context Effects on Social Judgments: Implications for Measurement in Consumer Research,” Advances in Consumer Research, 1992, vol.19, p.62-63.



 



Geeta Menon, Barbara Bickart, Seymour Sudman, and Johnny Blair, “How Well Do You Know Your Partner? Strategies for Formulating proxy-Reports and Their Effects on Convergence to Self-Reports,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1995, vol.XXXII, February, p.75-84.



 



Barbara Bickart and David Schmittlein, “The Distribution of Survey Contact and Participation in the United States: Constructing a Survey-Based Estimate,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, vol.XXXVI, May, p.286-294.



 



Geeta Menon, “Are the Parts Better than The Whole? The Effects of Decompositional Questions on Judgments of Frequent Behaviors,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, vol.XXXIV, August, p.335-346.



 



Dancker D, L. Daamen and Steven El de Bie, “Serial Context Effects in Survey Interviews,” Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, 1992, p.97-113.



 



Tom W. Smith, “Thoughts on The Nature of Context Effects,” Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, 1992, p.163-184.



 



Strube, Gerhard, “Answering Survey Questions: The Role of Memory,” in Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, 1987, p86-101.



 



Schwarz, Norbert, and Hanz-J. Hippler, “What Response Scales May Tell Your Respondents: Informative Functions of Response Alternatives,” in Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, 1987, p163-178.



 



Hippler, Hanz-J. and Norbert Schwarz, “Response Effects in Surveys,” in Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, 1987, p103-122.



 



Strack, Fritz and Leonard L. Martin, “Thinking, Judging, and Communicating A Process in Attitude Surveys,” in Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, 1987, p123-148.



 



6. eResearch



 



Stephen R. Porter, Michael E. Whitcomb, “The Impact of Contact Type on Web Survey Response Rates,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 2003, vol.67, p.579-588.



 



Dipayan Biswas, “Economics of Information in The Web Economy Towards a New Theory?” Journal of Business Research, 2004, vol.57, p.724-733.



 



David R. Schaefer, Don A. Dillman, “Development of A standard E-mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 1998, vol.62, 3; Fall, p.378-397.



 



Jeremy, P. Birnholtz, Daniel B. Horn, Thomas A. Finholt, Sung Joo Bae, “The Effects of Cash, Electronic, and Paper Gift Certificates as Respondent Incentives for a Web-Based Survey of Technologically Sophisticated Respondents,” Social Science Computer Review, 2004, vol.22n3, Fall, p.355-362.



 



Michael D. Kaplowitz, Timothy D. Hadlock Ralph Levine, “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 2004, vol.68n.1, Spring, p.94-101.



 



7. Meta-Analysis



 



Peterson, Robert A and Jolibert, Alain J. P., “A Meta-Analysis of Country-of-Origin



Effects,” Journal of International Business Studies, 1995, v26n4, Fourth Quarter p. 883-900.



 



Grewal, Dhruv, Kavanoor, Sukumar, Fern, Edward F., Costley, Carolyn, and Barnes,



James, “Comparative versus Noncomparative Advertising : A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 1997, v61n4, Oct p. 1-15.



 



VanderWerf, Pieter A and Mahon, John F., “Meta-analysis of the Impact of Research



Methods on Findings of First-Mover Advantage,” Management Science, 1997, v43n11, Nov p. 1510-1519.



 



Rao, Akshay R and Monroe, Kent B., “The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store



Name on Buyers' Perceptions of Product Quality : An Integrative Review,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1989, v26n3, Aug p. 351-357.



 



Peterson, Robert A, Albaum, Gerald, and Beltramini, Richard F., “A Meta-Analysis of



Effect Sizes in Consumer Behavior Experiments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1985, v12n1, Jun p. 97-103.



 



Fern, Edward F and Monroe, Kent B., “Effect-size Estimates: Issues and Problems in



Interpretation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1996, v23n2, Sep. p. 89-105.



 



Aradhna Krishna, Richard Briesch, Donald R. Lehmann, Hong Yuan, “A Meta-Analysis of The Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings,” Journal of Retailing, 2002, vol.78, p.101-118.



 



Julie Yu and Harris Cooper, “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires,” Journal of Marketing Research, 1983, vol.XX, February, p.36-44.



 



============================================================



From 12/10 to 1/7:  The execution of Meta Analysis by Prof. Hsin-Chen Lin



1. Meta-analysis introduction and how to use R software for meta-analysis



2. Meta-analysis coding for mean difference (d)



3. Meta-analysis coding for correlation coefficient (r)



4. How to quantify literature review (bibliometrics analysis)



5. How to use secondary data for empirical analysis: using social media data as examples



Students are asked to read the assigned papers in depth. Every paper will be presented by a group and discussed with the whole class. Each student will need to submit an A4-page summary of his/her chosen paper (including its contributions, the key findings, personal comments on the research method, and 1 question for the class discussions).



As these questions may serve as the basis for in-class discussion, students should send them via e-mail to me (yjlou@nccu.edu.tw or hsinchenlin@gmail.com), and to other students, by 23:59 on EVERY WEDNESDAY during the classes.



** Students are expected to spend 3-6 hours per week, to preview the papers and finish the weely assignment. 





 


 


Teaching Methods
Teaching Assistant

TBD


Requirement/Grading

1. Participation 50%



2. Final reports 50%



3. Total 100%


Textbook & Reference

Please see the reading list. 


Urls about Course
None
Attachment

?????????????????_2018.doc.pdf