課程1-10 由許牧彥老師主講
課程11-16 由宋皇志老師主講
17-18次課程兩位老師都將共同出席
許牧彥老師主講：
1(9/14) 課程簡介
T1- Innovation: A Guide to the Literature
Martin(2008) The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies
Rindfleisch et al.(2020) Innovation Research Themes for Our Changing Environment
背景知識：請參考碩士班課程「創新經濟學與產業動態分析」
https://seaeconomicsofinnovation.blogspot.com/
2(9/21) Foundations of Innovation Studies
- Nelson (1959), ‘The simple economics of basic research’, J Pol Econ 310
Nelson & Winter (1977), ‘In search of useful theory of innovation’, Res P 370
- Dosi & Winter (1994), An Introduction of the Evolutionary Theories of Economics, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 4, 153-172.
- Dosi, Llerena & Labini (2006), The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’, Research Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 10
3(9/28) Industry Evolution and Innovation Dynamics
- JM Utterback, WJ Abernathy (1975), ‘Dynamic model of innovation’, Omega 345
- Gort M, Klepper S. 1982. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Economic Journal 92: 630–653.
Klepper S. 1996. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review 86(3): 562–583.
INDUSTRY EVOLUTION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP- STEVEN KLEPPER'S CONTRIBUTIONS
- Adner, R. & Levinthal, D. 2001, Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation, Management Science, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p611-18.
Dosi & Winter (2009), Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes, LEM Working Paper Series, No. 2009/07
4 (10/5）Technological paradigms and trajectories
G Dosi (1982), ‘Technological paradigms and trajectories’, Res Policy 595
- G Dosi (1988), ‘Sources and microeconomic effects of innovation’, J Econ Lit 535
- PA David (1985), ‘Clio and economics of QWERTY’, Am Econ Rev 680
- Stefanoa, Gambardellab & Veronab(2012), Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions, Research Policy 41, 1283– 1295
5 (10/12） Technology-Push v.s. Demand Pull
- Adams P, Fontana R, Malerba F. 2013. The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: the role of industrial users in semiconductors. Research Policy 42(1): 1–14.
- Dawid, H., G. Pellegrino, & M. Vivarelli (2020) The role of demand in fostering product vs process innovation: a model and an empirical test, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, July. 20
- Guo , Wang, Su , and Wang (2020) Technology Push or Market Pull? Strategic Orientation in
Business Model Design and Digital Start-up Performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4):352–372.
6(10/19) The Innovator’s Dilemma
- ML Tushman, P Anderson (1986), ‘Tech discontinuities and org envts’, A Sc Qu 780
- RM Henderson, KB Clark (1990), ‘Architectural innovation’, Admin Sc Qu 690
Afuah & Bahram (1995), The Hypercube of Innovation, Research Policy, 24: 51-76.
- BALDWIN, Carliss Y. and Woodard, C. Jason. The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View. (2009).Platforms, Markets and Innovation. 19-44.
7（10/26）Disruptive Innovation
- Christensen, C.M. & R.S. Rosenbloom (1995), “Explaining the Attacker’s Advantage: Technological Paradigms, Organizational Dynamics, and the Value Network”, Research Policy, 24(2), 233-257.
Christensen CM (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma 565
- Adner, R. (2002), “When Are Technologies Disruptive? - A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition”, Strategic Management Journal., 23: 667–688.
- Glen M. Schmidt and Cheryl T. Druehl,(2008) “When Is a Disruptive Innovation Disruptive?”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25:347–369.
Mart?nez-Vergara et al. (2020) Clarifying the disruptive innovation puzzle: a critical review, European Journal of Innovation Management. https://www.emerald.com/insight/1460-1060.htm
8 (11/02) Knowledge Management of Firm
- B Kogut, U Zander (1992), ‘Knowledge of firm … and replication of technology”OS 725
- I Nonaka (1994), ‘Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’, Org Sc 855
- RM Grant (1996), ‘Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strat Mngt J 450
許牧彥（2003），從知識的經濟本質談知識產權的原理，科技發展政策報導，SR9206, 442-455。
9（11/09）Profiting from Innovation
- Teece, D. (1986) “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, Vol.15, 285-305.
Introduction to Teece (1986)’s Special Issue
Teece, D. (2006) Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol.35, 1131-1146.
- Pisano & Teece (2007), How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 50, NO. 1 FALL.
- Henkel, Baldwin & Shih. (2013) "IP Modularity: Profiting from Innovation by Aligning Product
Architecture with Intellectual Property." California Management Review 55, no. 4 (Summer): 65–82.
10(11/16) Measuring Innovation
- T6- Measuring Innovation
Oslo Manual，CIS: Community Innovation Statistics
第二次及第三次台灣創新調查問卷（TIS2，TIS3）
- Hsu, M. Y., and H. C. Chuang (2014), “Appropriation Strategies and Patenting Motivations - An Empirical Study of Taiwan CIS Data”, Academy of Management(AOM) Annual Meeting, August 1 - 5, in Philadelphia, PA.
- Hussain, S. and Terziovski, M. 2015. Intellectual Property Appropriation Strategy and its Impact on Innovation Performance. International Journal of Innovation Management. 20 (2):
宋皇志老師主講：
11(11/23) Philosophy & Economics of IP
- Hughes, J. (1988). The philosophy of intellectual property. Geo. LJ, 77, 287.
- Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90(4), 839-916.
- Bair, S. P. (2015). The Psychology of Patent Protection. Conn. L. Rev., 48, 297.
12(11/30) Management of IP
- Strategic management of intellectual property: an integrated approach. California management review, 55(4), 157-183.
- Peters, T., Thiel, J., & Tucci, C. L. (2013). Protecting growth options in dynamic markets: the role of strategic disclosure in integrated intellectual property strategies. California Management Review, 55(4), 121-142.
- Al-Aali, A. Y., & Teece, D. J. (2013). Towards the (strategic) management of intellectual property: Retrospective and prospective. California management review, 55(4), 15-30.
13(12/7) IP & Innovation (I) the Influence/Importance of IP on Innovation
- Moser, P. (2005). How do patent laws influence innovation? evidence from nineteenth-century world's fairs. The American Economic Review, 95(4), 1214-1236.
- Encaoua, D., Guellec, D., & Martínez, C. (2006). Patent systems for encouraging innovation: Lessons from economic analysis. Research policy, 35(9), 1423-1440.
- Castaldi, C. (2018). To trademark or not to trademark: The case of the creative and cultural industries. Research Policy, 47(3), 606-616.
14(12/14) IP & Innovation (II) IP may Harm Innovation
- Shaver, L. (2012). Illuminating innovation: From patent racing to patent war. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 69, 1891.
- Carrier, M. A. (2012). Copyright and innovation: The untold story. Wis. L. Rev., 891.
- Bone, R. G. (1998). A new look at trade secret law: doctrine in search of justification. Calif. L. Rev., 86, 241.
15(12/21) IP & Innovation (III) Economic Perspectives of IP on innovation
- Merges, R. P. (1988). Commercial success and patent standards: Economic perspectives on innovation. Calif. L. Rev., 76, 803.
- Sherry, E. F., & Teece, D. J. (2004). Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Research Policy, 33(2), 179-191.
- Friedman, D. D., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1991). Some economics of trade secret law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 61-72.
16(12/28) Interaction of IP & Antitrust
- Lemley, M. A. (2006). A new balance between IP and antitrust. Sw. JL & Trade Am., 13, 237.
- Lemley, M. A. (2011). Industry-specific antitrust policy for innovation. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 637.
- Cotter, T. F. (2008). Patent holdup, patent remedies, and antitrust responses. J. Corp. L., 34, 1151.
17（2024／01／04）期末報告與討論
18（2024／01／11）期末報告與討論
|